Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M., and you can Scontras, G. (2015). The differential symbolization off matter and gender within the Foreign-language. Linguist. Rev. 32, 703–737.

Hartsuiker, R., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you will Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphophonological impacts into design out-of subject-verb contract. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1316–1326.

Heycock, C., and you will Zamparelli, Roentgen. (2005). Family unit members and you can acquaintances: plurality, coordination, plus the framework off DP. Nat. Lang. thirteen, 201–270.

Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, Yards., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and you may Rubia, F. (2003). Parallels and you may differences between phrase structure and you can morphosyntactic abuses in Foreign-language: a conference-related potentials studies. Lang. Cogn. Process. 18, 113–142.

Igoa, J. Meters., Garcia-Albea, J Malaga bride. Age., and Sanches-Casas, R. (1999). Gender-matter dissociation inside sentence development for the Language. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 163–196.

Krstev, C., and you will Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you may Lexicon – Common Incompletness,” into the Procedures of one’s Corpus Linguistics Appointment, eds P. Danielsson and you can M. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.

Malko, A good., and you may Slioussar, Letter. (2013). “Attraction errors within the gender arrangement: Research out of Russian,” into the Proceedings Certified Ways to Slavic Linguistics: The third Indiana Fulfilling, eds S. Franks, et al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Drive), 162–175.

). “Past conjunct contract within the Slovenian,” in the Proceedings off Certified Remedies for Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, M. Goledzinowska, and you may You. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 210-227.

Mitic, I., and you can Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Structural ambiguity and you can optionality away from agreement activities within the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct arrangement. An effective J. Gen. Linguist. 4:six.

Nevins, An effective., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you may Phillips, C. (2007). This new part of feature-number and show-type in control Hindi verb contract violations. Brain Res. 1164, 81–94.

Puskar, Z., and Murphy, Good. (2015). “Nearest conjunct agreement for the serbo-croatian: a rule-ordering account,” within the Subject areas during the InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. ninety five, eds A. Assmann, S. Lender, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and you may Elizabeth. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.

Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and you may Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb arrangement inside the Language and you will English: differences in brand new role off abstract constraints. Cognition 61, 261–298.

Semant

Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Meters., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, Letter., Kresic, Meters., ainsi que al. (2018). Whenever linearity is available more than ladder into the syntax. PNAS 115, 495–500. doi: /pnas.1712729115

The new five realistically possible combos in addition to their services is illustrated during the (21)

Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Meters., Leko, N., mais aussi al. (2016). Morphosyntactic production of control contract inside the Southern area Slavic–a comparative investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 187–224.

This area explains some technology concerns about the options built in the style of our very own experiment, inside the white of one’s unique qualities away from South carolina morphology. It’s lined up generally for these interested in the latest theoretic and you can descriptive linguistic, unlike psycholinguistic areas of the research.

Inside our fresh build, you will find capitalized for the proven fact that in Sc NSg nouns end in a choice of -e or perhaps in -o, and therefore their plural results in -an effective, when you are at the same time FSg nouns end in -a beneficial, as well as their plural variations lead to -elizabeth. This production an effective crossed, but really unfinished syncretism.

The blend regarding NSg and FPl allows the synthesis of minimal pairs between a good syncretic and you may a non-syncretic pair of nouns, once the mixture of NPl and you may FSg allows just one options, which is syncretic.

We used limited sets as in (20a) within our vital stimuli. The latest chose choice, however, makes it possible for a couple of sub-options, based on and therefore gender–matter combination arrives since basic, and you can hence while the last conjunct. This is decided by various other comparable attention.

This new verb bears the fresh new endings: -o to possess NSg, -a for NPl and you may FSg, otherwise -elizabeth to own FPl – we.age., it is possible to identify NSg out-of FPl for the verb. Thus, besides the unambiguously default male end -i, when a verb in -elizabeth are introduced, we were sure it absolutely was FPl, of course a great verb during the -o was delivered, we realized it absolutely was NSg. Although not, when a verb inside the -an ended up being lead – it actually was unsure if it was plural, agreeing within the sex into the earliest conjunct (NPl), or it was just one and you may concurred into the intercourse to your last conjunct (FSg).